Existence and Efficiency of Nash Equilibria under Deterministic Voting
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper considers an economy with a public good where a decision must be made both about the level of the public good and the taxation imposed on each citizen (multi-dimensional policy space). In this context, we derive two results: i) we show that a Nash equilibrium exists under deterministic voting, ii) we show that political competition is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the elimination of political rents (efficiency). In our political game a Nash equilibrium (under deterministic voting) exists because politicians commit to the level of the public good but not to the level of taxation. Furthermore, we show that efficiency requires appropriate political institutions (maximum taxation constraint). These results are interesting, because they show that i) partial commitment is an important element of the efficient solution of this problem, ii) to the best of our knowledge, this is the only game with multi-dimensional policy space, where an equilibrium exists, it is efficient and political rents are zero.
منابع مشابه
Probabilistic Voting in the Spatial Model of Elections: The Theory of Office-motivated Candidates
We unify and extend much of the literature on probabilistic voting in two-candidate elections. We give existence results for mixed and pure strategy equilibria of the electoral game. We prove general results on optimality of pure strategy equilibria vis-a-vis a weighted utilitarian social welfare function, and we derive the well-known “mean voter” result as a special case. We establish broad co...
متن کاملNew Results on Equilibria in Strategic Candidacy
We consider a voting setting where candidates have preferences about the outcome of the election and are free to join or leave the election. The corresponding candidacy game, where candidates choose strategically to participate or not, has been studied by Dutta et al. [6], who showed that no non-dictatorial voting procedure satisfying unanimity is candidacy-strategyproof, that is, is such that ...
متن کاملOn Generalized Weight Nash Equilibria for Generalized Multiobjective Games
In this paper, we will introduce the general concepts of generalized multiobjective game, generalized weight Nash equilibria and generalized Pareto equilibria. Next using the fixed point theorems due to Idzik [5] and Kim-Tan [6], we shall prove the existence theorems of generalized weight Nash equilibria under general hypotheses. And as applications of generalized weight Nash equilibria, we sha...
متن کاملNash Equilibria for a Quadratic Voting Game
N individuals must choose between two collective alternatives. Under Quadratic Voting (QV), individuals buy vote in favor of their preferred alternative from a clearing house, paying the square of the number of votes purchased, and the sum of all votes purchased determines the outcome. Heuristic arguments and experimental results have suggested that this simple, detail-free mechanism is utilita...
متن کاملPlurality Voting with Truth-Biased Agents
We study a game-theoretic model for Plurality, one of the most wellstudied and widely-used voting rules. It is well known that the most standard game-theoretic approaches can be problematic in the sense that they lead to a multitude of Nash equilibria, many of which are counter-intuitive. Instead, we focus on a model recently proposed to avoid such issues [2, 6, 11]. The main idea of the model ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008